<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celcom Wireless Broadband Service Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weblogku.com/technology/celcom-wireless-broadband-service-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weblogku.com/technology/celcom-wireless-broadband-service-review</link>
	<description>experience, facts, tips, reviews, comments, opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azam</title>
		<link>http://www.weblogku.com/technology/celcom-wireless-broadband-service-review/comment-page-1#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Azam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogku.com/?p=747#comment-501</guid>
		<description>The important thing on wireless broadband is the consistency and the coverage. If it is consistent but the coverage is very low, I think there&#039;s not much point as well. It is better to test it out for few days as most of the wireless broadband service provider will usually give an ample time for you to test their service. If you&#039;re not satisfied with their service, just return it back.
Thank for your sharing your experience. May I know from which area you&#039;re using your Celcom Broadband?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important thing on wireless broadband is the consistency and the coverage. If it is consistent but the coverage is very low, I think there&#8217;s not much point as well. It is better to test it out for few days as most of the wireless broadband service provider will usually give an ample time for you to test their service. If you&#8217;re not satisfied with their service, just return it back.<br />
Thank for your sharing your experience. May I know from which area you&#8217;re using your Celcom Broadband?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ridzuan hashim</title>
		<link>http://www.weblogku.com/technology/celcom-wireless-broadband-service-review/comment-page-1#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>ridzuan hashim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogku.com/?p=747#comment-500</guid>
		<description>i used celcom broadband (384 kbps). I&#039;m very frustrated because almost all the time the speed that i got is very poor which is less than 50 kbps and there is no consistency in it. Now i understand the meaning of Digi advertisement in tv about &#039;consistensy&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i used celcom broadband (384 kbps). I&#8217;m very frustrated because almost all the time the speed that i got is very poor which is less than 50 kbps and there is no consistency in it. Now i understand the meaning of Digi advertisement in tv about &#8216;consistensy&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celcom Wireless Broadband Service 2nd Review &#124; weblogku.com</title>
		<link>http://www.weblogku.com/technology/celcom-wireless-broadband-service-review/comment-page-1#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Celcom Wireless Broadband Service 2nd Review &#124; weblogku.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogku.com/?p=747#comment-334</guid>
		<description>[...] the service is getting worse. On my first review, the service to me is very good compared to other wireless broadband service providers at that time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the service is getting worse. On my first review, the service to me is very good compared to other wireless broadband service providers at that time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
